Kenneth Shanoff v. State of Illinois Department of Human Services’s Empirical Analysis
258 F.3d 696 · 2001
Citation profile
22 federal appellate · 2 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 62 later decisions — most recently May 2022 · most notably Miller v. Kenworth of Dothan, Inc. (2002), Jones v. UPS Ground Freight (2012)
22 federal appellate · 2 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 42 U.S.C. § 2000E (§ 701 of the Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964) · 42 U.S.C. § 2000E (§ 703 of the Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964) · 42 U.S.C. § 2000E (§ 704 of the Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964) · 42 U.S.C. § 2000E (§ 706 of the Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964)
Relies on Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc. · Harris v. Forklift Systems, Inc. · Meritor Savings Bank, FSB v. Vinson · Faragher v. City of Boca Raton · United Air Lines, Inc. v. Evans
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 62 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“an unlawful employment practice for an employer . . . to discriminate against any individual with respect to [her] compensation, terms, conditions, or privileges of employment, because of such individual's race, color, religion, sex, or national origin.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“The continuing violation doctrine allows a plaintiff to get relief for time-barred acts by linking them with acts within the limitations period.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“'repeated incidents of verbal harassment that continue despite the employee's objections that are indicative of a hostile work environment'....”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.