Zupp v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1972
Citation profile
95 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 98 later decisions — most recently February 2014 · most notably Ballard v. State (1974), Reid v. State (1978)
95 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on United States v. Wade · Burdeau v. McDowell · 64 Cal. 2d 159 - Ballard v. Superior Court of San Diego County · Graham v. State · ANTROBUS v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 98 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““Conceding the invalidity of the arrest warrant, the evidence referred to was obtained in the searches made under the aforesaid waiver and consent; and we find no merit to the defendant’s claim that such consent was coerced. The illegality of the arrest, therefore, does not bear upon the admissibility of the evidence.” 258 Ind. 625 , 283 N. E. 2d at 541-542 . (our emphasis)”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Sanders v. State“We believe the rationale of the California Court [.Ballard v. Superior Cf] is applicable to the case at bar, i.e. that not only are the results of a lie detector test inadmissible (see annotation in 23 A.L.R.2d 1306 ) but that the results of the test would neither lead to any additional evidence nor aid the appellant in the preparation of his defense.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“Defense counsel failed to offer any tenable reason to the trial court why he should be given the results; moreover, we cannot conceive of their pertinence to defendant’s case. Not only is evidence of polygraph tests inadmissible, but the results of the test would neither lead to any additional evidence nor aid petitioner in preparation for trial.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Okumura
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.