Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

259 Va. 405

527 S.E.2d 415

Moore v. Commonwealth

Supreme Court of Virginia

Decided March 3, 2000

Supreme Court of Virginia · decided 2000-03-03

Cited by 33 later decisions — most recently October 2008 · most notably Shackleford v. Commonwealth (2001), Nelson v. WARDEN OF KEEN MTN. CORRECTIONAL (2001)

33 state decisions

Relies on Moore v. Commonwealth · Turner v. Commonwealth

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2000-03-03

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

JUSTICE KINSER,

¶1with whom JUSTICE LACY joins, concurring.

¶2I concur in the result reached by the majority in this case. However, I write separately to reiterate my belief that the notice requirement at issue is not a prerequisite for the juvenile court’s exercise of its subject matter jurisdiction. David Moore v. Commonwealth, 259 Va. 431, 527 S.E.2d 406 (2000) (this day decided) (Kinser, J., dissenting); see also Turner v. Commonwealth, 216 Va. 666, 667, 222 S.E.2d 517, 518 (1976) (holding that mandatory requirement of written notice was not jurisdictional).

/259/va/405 · .json · Public domain