Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 26 CALAPP2D 334 - People v. Moreno

People v. Moreno’s Empirical Analysis

1938

Citation profile

16
cited by 16 later decisions
1
states following
March 1963
most recently cited

16 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 16 later decisions — most recently March 1963

16 state decisions

1001938194019501960decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 111 Cal. App. 215 - People v. Collier · People v. Benson · People v. Becker · 18 Cal. App. 359 - People v. Lewis · People v. Zerman

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Unless the appellate court can say that the testimony is so obviously and inherently improbable as to leave the court no recourse without self-stultification, except to reverse the judgment, the reviewing court should not interfere with the verdict and the judgment of the trial court upon that ground. (People v. Antunez, 28 Cal.App. 740 [ 153 P. 963 ]; People v. Becker, 140 Cal.App. 162 [ 35 P.2d 196 ].) Such improbability must ‘plainly appear before the reviewing court should assume the functions of the trial jury’. (People v. Antunez, supra.) ‘ Contradictions and inconsistencies in the testimony of a witness alone will not constitute inherent improbability’ (People v. Amadio, 25 Cal.App. 729 [ 145 P. 151 ], and ‘it is not sufficient that the testimony may disclose circumstances which are unusual. ’ (People v. Collier, 111 Cal.App. 215, 226 [ 295 P. 898 ].)””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.