Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 26 F.3d 531 - Missouri Pacific Railroad v. Harbison-Fischer Manufacturing Co.

Missouri Pacific Railroad v. Harbison-Fischer Manufacturing Co.’s Empirical Analysis

26 F.3d 531 · 1994

Citation profile

23
cited by 23 later decisions
1
states following
December 2017
most recently cited

11 federal appellate · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 23 later decisions — most recently December 2017

11 federal appellate · 1 state decisions

100199420002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Celotex Corporation v. Catrett H · Nissho-Iwai American Corp. v. Kline · Abbott v. Equity Group, Inc. · Dew Inc v. Local Laborers' International Union of North America · McCarty v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 23 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[W]e can affirm the district court on the alternate grounds asserted below.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “Harbison-Fischer notes that the MO-PAC/Custom Wire lease clearly provides that, as between MOPAC and Custom Wire, Custom Wire is responsible for remediation responsibilities arising during the course of the Custom Wire’s (sic) lease. Harbison-Fischer " further contends that it has a right to sue for enforcement of the MOPAC/Custom Wire lease because it is a third-party beneficiary of that lease. Harbison-Fischer claims that once Custom Wire delivered Harbison-Fischer a copy of the MOPAC/Custom Wire lease in exchange for Harbison-Fischer’s building plans, Harbison-Fischer became' a third-party beneficiary to the lease.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.