Sutherland v. Gillespie

Decided November 5, 1919.)

Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1919-11-05

<p>Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Western District of Oklahoma; John H. Cotteral, Judge.</p> <p>Suit between Z. W. Sutherland and E. N. Gillespie. From a decree for the latter, the former appeals.</p>

2 counsel of record

Relies on Wright v. Gillespie · O'Donnell v. Gillespie

Affirmed · Opinion by Kimbrough Stone · Decided 1919-11-05

¶1Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Western District of Oklahoma; John H. Cotteral, Judge.

¶2Suit between Z. W. Sutherland and E. N. Gillespie. From a decree for the latter, the former appeals.

¶3Affirmed.

¶4John B. Arnold, of Duluth, Minn., and P. W. Cress, of Perry, Okl., for appellant '

¶5Robert J. Dodds, of Pittsburgh, Pa., and C. B. Ames, of Oklahoma City, Old. (W. A. Sipe, Jr., of Tulsa, Okl., on the brief), for appellee.

¶6Before HOOK and STONE, Circuit Judges, and AMIDON, District Judge.

¶7STONE, Circuit Judge.

¶8This case is a companion case to Frank Wright v. E. N. Gillespie, 261 Fed. 46, — C. C. A. —, Dennis O’Donnell v. E. N. Gillespie, 261 Fed. 48, - C. C. A. -, and R. F. Howe v. E. N. Gillespie, 261 Fed. 48, — C. C. A. -, decided during this term. For the reasons given in those cases, the judgment in this case is affirmed.