Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 261 N.C. 612 - Jones v. Jones

Jones v. Jones’s Empirical Analysis

1964

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
July 1989
most recently cited

8 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently July 1989

8 state decisions

40196419701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Kiger v. Kiger · Richardson v. Richardson

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““When a husband and wife execute a valid deed of separation and thereafter live apart, such separation exists by mutual consent from the date of the execution of the instrument. Richardson v. Richardson, 257 N.C. 705 , 127 S.E. 2d 525 . As long as the deed stands unimpeached, neither party can attack the legality of the separation on account of the misconduct of the other prior to its execution.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.