¶1The decree in this case was interlocutory, and the ap*452peal from it is, therefore, quashed, at appellant’s costs, without prejudice to his right to present his claim for rent as a preferred one upon distribution of the funds in the hands of the receiver.
261 Pa. 450
Lifter v. Earle Co.
Decided June 3, 1918
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · decided 1918-06-03
Appeal, No. 76, Jan. T., 1918, by Samuel Sternberger, from decree of C. P. No. 3, Philadelphia Co., Dec. T., 1917, No. 3329, refusing order upon receivers for the payment of rent in case of Joseph J. Lifter, trading as Lifter Ice Cream Company, v. The Earle Company. Bill in equity for the appointment of a receiver. Before McMichael, P. J. Petition for order upon receivers of a corporation to pay rent of premises occupied by the receiver.
Affirmed · Decided 1918-06-03