263 U.S. 675
Docket No. 41.
Supreme Court of the United States · decided 1923-10-08
1 counsel of record
Relies on Jett Bros. Distilling Co. v. City of Carrollton
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1923-10-08
Cited by 21 later decisions — most recently May 2001
6 federal appellate · 4 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
View the full empirical analysis of this case →
¶1Error to the Supreme Court of the State of Kansas.
¶2Mr. Samuel Feller, with' whom Mr. H. M. Lang-worthy was on the briefs, for plaintiffs in error. Mr. Douglas Hudson appeared for defendants in error.
¶4Dismissed for want of jurisdiction upon the authority of § 237 of the Judicial Code, as amended by the Act of September 6, 1916, c. 448, § 2, 39 Stat. 726; Jett Bros. Distilling Co. v. Carrollton, 252 U. S. 1, 5-6.