Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

264 So. 2d 76

Brant v. Brooks

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1972-06-09

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently October 1972

1 state decisions

Relies on 61 So. 2d 366 - Largay Enterprises Inc. v. Berman · 162 So. 2d 668 - Belfield v. Lochner · Ball v. Harris Paving & Construction Co.

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1972-06-09

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

PIERCE, Chief Judge.

¶1Appellant Brant appeals an adverse judgment in a suit for ejectment, entitling *77appellee Brooks to the possession of the property involved and awarding certain damages.

¶2Appellant did not include in the record on appeal appellee’s complaint, motion for summary judgment, attached affidavits, or the testimony or a stipulated statement of the evidence produced at the hearing on damages. This Court deferred action on appellee’s motion to quash the appeal until consideration of the appeal on the merits.

¶3The record is insufficient to determine whether or not the trial Court committed error in entering the final judgment appealed. We, therefore, affirm the action of the trial Court. Castaldo v. Singapore, J. F. Inc., Fla.App.1972, 258 So.2d 499; Speight v. Dulimba, Fla.App.1968, 208 So.2d 833; Belfield v. Lochner, Fla.App.1964, 162 So.2d 668; Beyer v. Carey, Fla.1952, 61 So.2d 373.

¶4Affirmed.

MANN and McNULTY, J., concur.
/264/so2d/76 · .json · Public domain