¶1No. —, Original.
¶2Mr. Mark St ear-man and Mr. Emanuel J. Myers for petitioners. Mr. Wolcott H. Pitkin and Mr. Samuel J. Rosensohn for respondent.
¶3Motion for leave to file petition for a writ of mandamus herein denied.
264 U.S. 574
Ex parte Higgins
Supreme Court of the United States · decided 1924-04-14
Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently December 1927
1 counsel of record
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1924-04-14
View the full empirical analysis of this case →