Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Motion granted · Opinion by (per_curiam) · Decided 1920-04-20
How this case has been cited
Cited by 14 later decisions — most recently October 1960
3 federal appellate · 2 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
¶5Motion allowed, in order to correct an inadvertent error in the decree for mandate as originally entered, however by such allowance implying no modification of the views contained in the opinions.
¶7It is ordered that the decree entered November 15, 1919, be and the same hereby is amended to read as follows:
“The decree of the District Court is reversed, and the ease is remanded to that court for further proceedings not inconsistent with the opinion passed down November 15, 1919, as explained by the per curiam opinion of January 6, 1920, and the appellant recovers his costs of appeal.”
