Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

266 U.S. 547

Docket No. 95.

Tod v. Waldman

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided January 12, 1925.

Supreme Court of the United States · decided 1925-01-12

1 counsel of record

Relies on Tod v. Waldman

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

No disposition · 8–0 · Decided 1925-01-12

How this case has been cited

Cited by 3 later decisions (2 by the Supreme Court) — most recently February 2018

1 federal appellate ·

101925193019401950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OP APPEALS POR THE SECOND CIRCUIT.

¶2Petition for rehearing.

¶3Memorandum on petition for rehearing, adding to directions heretofore given in this case. See ante, p. 113.

¶4Mr. Max J. Kohler, on the petition for rehearing.

¶5*548Mr. Chief Justice Taft

¶6delivered the opinion of the Court.

¶7By opinion handed down November 17, 1924, ante, 113, this Court sustained the contention of the Commissioner of Immigration that the respondents should not have been discharged under the writ of habeas corpus as directed by the Circuit Court of Appeals, but agreed with that court in its criticism of the action of the immigration authorities in dealing with the respondents here, and made modifications and additions to the order of that court. Counsel for the respondents in a petition for rehearing n'ow ask additional modifications. Of these, the Court deems it proper to grant two.

¶81st. Nothing in the order of this Court shall prejudice an application on behalf of Zenia Waldman to the discretion of the Secretary of Labor under § 21 of the Immigration Act of February 5, 1917, c. 29, 39 Stat. 874, 891, to accept satisfactory security against her becoming a public charge and on its being furnished to admit her to this country.

¶92nd. Nothing in the order of this Court shall prejudice an application for release on bail of the respondents pending compliance with the mandate of this Court.

/266/us/547 · .json · Public domain