Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 270 KAN 763 - State v. Cuchy

State v. Cuchy’s Empirical Analysis

2001

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
2
states following
December 2018
most recently cited

10 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Bell v. Wolfish · County of Riverside v. McLaughlin · In re Stephens · State v. Wakefield · State v. Thompson

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"[W]hen an arrest is made ..., the person arrested shall be taken without unnecessary delay before a magistrate of the court from which the warrant was issued. If the arrest has been made on probable cause, without a warrant, he shall be taken without unnecessary delay before the nearest available magistrate and a complaint shall be filed forthwith." (Emphases added.)”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “the requirement is for an arrestee to be taken before a judge or magistrate 'without unnecessary delay.' " State v. Cuchy , 270 Kan. 763 , 766, 19 P.3d 152 (2001). But the statute does not define "without unnecessary delay,”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “The general rule is that an unlawful detention, absent a showing of specific prejudice to the defendant's right to a fair trial, is not sufficient to justify the dismissal of criminal charges.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.