Jaffe v. Ackerman’s Empirical Analysis
1937
Citation profile
6 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently February 2005
6 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Newlove v. Callaghan · Schaible v. Ardner · Grand Rapids Trust Co. v. Nichols · Courtney v. Youngs · Michigan Beef & Provision Co. v. Coll
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““Although transactions between husband and wife should be closely scrutinized when the rights of creditors are involved, Magilavy v. Fekete, 251 Mich. 518 , the burden is upon him who seeks to set aside a transaction as fraudulent as to creditors, to adduce evidence in support of his claim, even though the transaction assailed is one between husband and wife. Darling v. Hurst, 39 Mich. 765 ; Peaslee v. Collier, 83 Mich. 549 .””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Dean v. Torrence
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.