279 U.S. 820
Docket No. 632.
Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdictional statement submitted April 8, 1929.
Decided April 15, 1929.
Supreme Court of the United States · decided 1929-04-15
2 counsel of record
Relies on Arnold v. United States ex rel. W. B. Guimarin & Co. · Schlosser v. Hemphill
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1929-04-15
Cited by 57 later decisions (7 by the Supreme Court) — most recently March 1999 · most notably Parratt v. Taylor (1981), Fuentes v. Shevin (1972)
4 federal appellate · 11 district · 21 state decisions — followed in 16 states
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
View the full empirical analysis of this case →
¶1Messrs. George W. Morgan and Cleon Headley for appellant.
¶2No appearance for appellee.
¶4The appeal is dismissed on the authority of § 237 (a) of the Judicial Code as amended by the act of February 13, 1925 (43 Stat. 936, 937), for lack of jurisdiction, on the ground that the judgment sought to be reviewed is not a final one. Schlosser v. Hemphill, 198 U. S. 173, 175; Arnold v. United States for the use of Guimarin & Co., 263 U. S. 427, 434.