Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

28 A.3d 915

In Re Howells

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided September 29, 2011

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · decided 2011-09-29

Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently May 2014

3 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2011-09-29

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

In re the Nomination Petitions filed by David HOWELLS, Jr. as a Candidate for the Office of Magisterial District Judge in Magisterial District #31-1-04. Appeal of Objectors Joseph P. Maher, Joseph James McGrath, Joseph S. Hilliard, Lisa A. Hardman, Theresa Brown and Meloney Dosunmu.

No. 47 MAP 2011.

¶1Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.

Argued September 15, 2011.
Decided September 29, 2011.

¶2John Joseph Contino, PA State Ethics Commission, Robin M. Hittie, for Amicus Curiae, PA State Ethics Commission.

¶3Shauna Christine Clemmer, for Participants, Bureau of Elections.

¶4Joseph P. Maher, Allentown, for Joseph James McGrath, Joseph S. Hilliard, Lisa A. Hardman, Theresa Brown, and Meloney Dosunmu.

¶5John M. Ashcraft III, Matthew R. Sorrentino, Allentown, for Election & Registration Commission of Lehigh County.

¶6Robert P. Daday, Annville, for David Howells, Jr.

¶7Lehigh County Election Bureau, pro se.

¶8BEFORE: CASTILLE, C.J., SAYLOR, EAKIN, BAER, TODD, McCAFFERY, ORIE MELVIN, JJ.

¶9

*916 ORDER

¶10PER CURIAM.

¶11The Order of the Commonwealth Court is AFFIRMED.

/28/a3d/915 · .json · Public domain