Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 28 Kan. App. 2d 768 - State v. Montes

28 Kan. App. 2d 768 - State v. Montes’s Empirical Analysis

2001

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
September 2005
most recently cited

4 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Herring v. New York · State v. Buggs · In re Stephens · Dickerson v. Kansas Department of Revenue · State v. Aikins

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “`The Kansas [rape shield] statute merely serves to focus both judges' and attorneys' attention upon the fact that the victim's prior sexual activity is not generally relevant, reminding them that a victim's lack of chastity has no bearing whatsoever on her truthfulness and generally has no bearing on the important issue of consent. '”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.