Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 28 NY 659 - Kerr v. . Mount

Kerr v. . Mount’s Empirical Analysis

1863

Citation profile

35
cited by 35 later decisions
12
states following
December 1968
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 1 district · 29 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 35 later decisions — most recently December 1968 · most notably Blossom v. . Estes (1881), Bowman v. Hazen (1904)

2 federal appellate · 1 district · 29 state decisions — followed in 12 states

11018631870188018901900191019201930194019501960decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Hanmer v. Wilsey

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 35 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Conceding it [the writ] to have been issued by proper authority in respect to jurisdiction, still, it having been set aside as irregular, it afforded no justification afterwards for acts previously done under it by the jiarty in whose favor it was issued. If issued by competent authority and regular upon its face, it might afford protection to the officer for his acts previously done under it, but none whatever to lire party. As to him, it was then as though no process whatever had been issued, and the goods had been taken and detained by his order without any process. Tlie .moment it was set aside the party became a trespasser ab initio.” Chapman v. Dyett, 11 Wend. 31 -33; Otis v. Jones, 21 Wend. 394 ; Hanmer v. Wilsey, 17 Wend. 91 ; Higgins v. Whitney, 24 Wend. 379 ; Lyon v. Yates, 52 Barb. 243 ; Webb v. Bailey, 54 N. Y. 166 .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.