280 Pa. Super. 462 - Commonwealth v. Freeman’s Empirical Analysis
1980
Citation profile
12
cited by 12 later decisions
1
states following
September 1985
most recently cited
12 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Commonwealth v. Mayfield · Commonwealth v. Mitchell · Commonwealth v. Ehredt · Commonwealth v. Lamonna · Commonwealth v. Wade
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The Commonwealth has the burden, by a preponderance of the evidence, of showing it has met the requirements of Rule 1100(c). Cf. Commonwealth v. Wade, 475 Pa. 399 , 380 A.2d 782 (1977); Commonwealth v. Mitchell, 472 Pa. 553 , 372 A.2d 826 (1977). Furthermore, in reviewing a hearing court’s ruling that the Commonwealth has met its burden, we consider only the evidence presented by the Commonwealth and so much evidence, as fairly read in the context of the record as a whole, remains uncontradicted. See Commonwealth v. Mitchell, supra. Commonwealth v. Ehredt, supra [485 Pa.] at 194, 401 A.2d at 360 .”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.