Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 280 Va. 447 - Blanton v. Com.

Blanton v. Com.’s Empirical Analysis

2010

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
July 2012
most recently cited

4 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Cheng v. Commonwealth · Breard v. Commonwealth · Schmitt v. Commonwealth · Green v. Commonwealth · Sheppard v. Commonwealth

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The decision whether to grant a motion for mistrial lies within a trial court’s exercise of discretion. When a motion for mistrial is made, based upon an allegedly prejudicial event, the trial court must make an initial factual determination, in the light of all the circumstances of the case, whether the defendant’s rights are so indelibly prejudiced as to necessitate a new trial. Unless we can say that the trial court’s determination was wrong as a matter of law, we will not disturb its judgment on appeal.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.