Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

281 F.2d 195

Docket No. 14052.

Bomar v. Boyd

Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals

Decided June 13, 1960.

Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1960-06-13

2 counsel of record

Relies on Strunk v. Bomar

Opinion by (per_curiam) · Decided 1960-06-13

¶1Henry C. Foutch, Asst. Atty. Gen. of Tennessee, George F. McCanless, Atty. Gen. of Tennessee, on the brief, for appellant.

¶2John J. Hooker, Jr., Nashville, Tenn., Hooker & Hooker, Nashville, Tenn., of counsel, James F. Neal, of Turney & Turney, Washington, D. C., and Henry W. Hooker, of Hooker & Hooker, Nashville, Tenn., on the brief, for appellee.

¶3Before McALLISTER, Chief Judge, SIMONS, Senior Judge, and CECIL, Circuit Judge.

¶4PER CURIAM.

¶5The above cause coming on to be heard upon the record, the briefs of the parties, and the arguments of counsel in open court, and the court being duly advised:

¶6Now, therefore, it is ordered, adjudged and decreed that the decree of the District Court be and is hereby affirmed upon the opinion of Judge William E. Miller.

/281/f2d/195 · .json · Public domain