281 U.S. 695
Docket No. 590.
Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdictional statement submitted March 12, 1930.
Decided March 17, 1930.
Supreme Court of the United States · decided 1930-03-17
1 counsel of record
Relies on Zucht v. King · Sugarman v. United States · State of Oklahoma v. State of Texas (United States, Intervener)
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1930-03-17
Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently September 1977
2 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
View the full empirical analysis of this case →
¶1Mr. Mack C. Davis, pro se. No appearance for appellee.
¶3The appeal herein is dismissed for the want of a federal question · Case Law">substantial federal question. Wabash R. R. Co. v. Flannigan, 192 U. S. 29; Erie R. R. Co. v. Solomon, 237 U. S. 427; Zucht v. King, 260 U. S. 174; Sugarman v. United States, 249 U. S. 182; C. A. King & Co. v. Horton, 276 U. S. 600; Bank of Indianola v. Miller, 276 U. S. 605; Roe v. Kansas, 278 U. S. 191.