In Re Gosman’s Empirical Analysis
2002
Citation profile
1 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Relationships
Applies 11 U.S.C. § 103 · 11 U.S.C. § 1128 · 11 U.S.C. § 1129 · 11 U.S.C. § 341 · 11 U.S.C. § 522 · 28 U.S.C. § 1334 · 28 U.S.C. § 157
Relies on United States v. Ron Pair Enterprises, Inc. · Dewsnup v. Timm · Norwest Bank Worthington v. Ahlers · Bank of America National Trust and Savings Association, v. 203 North Lasalle Street Partnership · In the Matter of Malen A. Juzwiak, Debtor-Appellant
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“the core dispute ... centers on whether the term ‘any property’ as used in Section 1129(b)(2)(B)(ii) encompasses property which is 'exempt property.’”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. In Re Bullard“`Any' does not refer to certain things and not others. `Any' means `every' and `all.' It is unlimited.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.