Saade v. Sec. Connection Inc.’s Empirical Analysis
2017
Citation profile
1 district ·
Relationships
Applies 12 U.S.C. § 2605 · 12 U.S.C. § 2614 · 15 U.S.C. § 1692 (Fair Debt Collection Practices Act) · 15 U.S.C. § 1692K (Sherman Antitrust Act) · 15 U.S.C. § 1692L (Fair Debt Collection Practices Act)
Relies on Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly · Ashcroft v. Iqbal · Angie Chesser v. Amos Sparks · Langadinos v. American Airlines, Inc. · Rodi v. Southern New England School of Law
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“See Boivin v. Black , 225 F.3d 36 , 43 (1st Cir. 2000). In particular, courts are instructed to endeavor,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“within reasonable limits, to guard against the loss of pro se claims due to technical defects.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“Rodi v. S. New England Sch. of Law , 389 F.3d 5 , 20 (1st Cir. 2004).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.