283 Pa. Super. 562 - Brogley v. Chambersburg Engineering Co.’s Empirical Analysis
1981
Citation profile
27
cited by 27 later decisions
1
states following
February 1984
most recently cited
27 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Slagter v. Thrifty Clean, Inc. · Foster v. United States Aviation Underwriters, Inc. · Bartkewich v. Billinger
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 27 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(a) Entry upon docket below. No order shall be appeal-able until it has been entered upon the appropriate docket in the lower court..... (c) Orders not appealable. A direction by the lower court that a specified judgment, sentence or other order shall be entered, unaccompanied by actual entry of the specified order in the docket, or a direction that a verdict of a jury be recorded or entered, or an order denying a motion for a new trial, does not constitute an appealable order. Any such order shall be reduced to judgment and docketed before an appeal is taken.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“We have repeatedly advised the profession that an order refusing a new trial is interlocutory and is unappealable. [Citation omitted.] The appeal should not be filed and may not be entertained until a final judgment is entered.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.