283 U.S. 796 - Spurrier v. Mitchell Irrigation District — 283 U.S. 796

How this case has been cited

Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently September 2007

4 state decisions

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

¶1Mr. J. M. Fitzgerald, with whom Mr. L. L. Raymond was on the brief, for appellants. Messrs. Thomas M. Morrow and William Morrow were on the brief for Mitchell Irrigation District, appellee.

¶2Messrs. J. G. Mothersead, Roscoe T. York, Floyd E. Wright, and Wm. H. Wright were on the brief for Gering & Ft. Laramie Irrigation District, appellee.

¶3Per Curiam:

¶4The appeal herein is dismissed for the want of jurisdiction, § 237 (a) Judicial Code, as amended by the Act of February 13, 1925, 43 Stat. 936, 937. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was allowed as a petition for writ of certiorari, as required by § 237 (c) Judicial Code as amended, 43 Stat. 936, 938, certiorari is denied for want of a substantial federal question. Wabash R. Co. v. Flannigan, 192 U. S. 29; Erie R. Co. v. Solomon, 237 U. S. 427; Zucht v. King, 260 U. S. 174; Sugarman v. United States, 249 U. S. 182; C. A. King & Co. v. Horton, 276 U. S. 600; Bank of Indianola v. Miller, 276 U. S. 605; Roe v. Kansas, 278 U. S. 191.