Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 285 F. Supp. 2d 1229 - Doe v. Mann

285 F. Supp. 2d 1229 - Doe v. Mann’s Empirical Analysis

2003

Citation profile

15
cited by 15 later decisions
5
states following
November 2018
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 1 district · 8 state decisions

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1162 · 18 U.S.C. § 1163 · 25 U.S.C. § 1901 (§ 2 of the Indian Child Welfare Act of 1978) · 25 U.S.C. § 1911 (§ 101 of the Indian Child Welfare Act of 1978) · 25 U.S.C. § 1912 (§ 102 of the Indian Child Welfare Act of 1978) · 25 U.S.C. § 1914 (§ 104 of the Indian Child Welfare Act of 1978) · 25 U.S.C. § 1915 (§ 105 of the Indian Child Welfare Act of 1978) · 25 U.S.C. § 1918 (§ 108 of the Indian Child Welfare Act of 1978)

Relies on Conley v. Gibson · District of Columbia Court of Appeals v. Feldman · Rooker v. Fidelity Trust Co. · Touche Ross & Co. v. Redington · Morton v. Mancari

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Any Indian child who is the subject of any action for foster care placement or termination of parental rights under State law, any parent or Indian custodian from whose custody such child was removed, and the Indian child's tribe may petition any court of competent jurisdiction to invalidate such action upon a showing that such action violated any provision of sections 1911, 1912, and 1913 of this title.”
    6 later decisions quote this exact passage
    e.g. In the Interest of D.H. · In Re DH
  2. “There is no evidence in the text of section 1915, the structure of ICWA or the legislative history that Congress intended to create a cause of action for”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
    e.g. Interest of M.D.
  3. “We believe that reservations located in States subject to Public Law 83-280 should be specifically excluded from section 101(a)....”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
    e.g. Doe v. Mann

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.