Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 289 N.C. 47 - State v. Poole

State v. Poole’s Empirical Analysis

1975

Citation profile

12
cited by 12 later decisions
1
states following
September 1991
most recently cited

12 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 12 later decisions — most recently September 1991

12 state decisions

80197519801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Dombrowski v. Pfister · State v. Williams · State v. McClain · State v. McClain · State v. Goldberg

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Evidence of other offenses is inadmissible if its only relevancy is to show the character of the accused or his disposition to commit an offense of the nature of the one charged; but if it tends to prove any other relevant facts it will not be excluded merely because it also shows him to have been guilty of an independent crime.” State v. Poole, 289 N.C. 47, 50-51 , 220 S.E. 2d 320, 323 (1975) (quoting 1 Stansbury, North Carolina Evidence § 91 (Brandis rev. 1973)).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.