¶1Customs Duties—Castings of Iron—Parts of Ice-Machine.
¶2Iron castings, intended to form parts of an ice-machine, hut which have to he put together after their arrival here, and to which other parts have to he added, in order to make a complete machine, are “castings of iron not specially enumerated or provided for, ” within the meaning of Schedule C of the tariff act of March 3, 1883, and are dutiable at one and one-fourth cents per pound.
¶3At Law.
¶4Suit to recover back $417.75, duties paid under protest upon iron castings intended to form part of an ice-machine. All parts of the machine were not imported, and the parts imported had to be put together, and others added after their arrival in this country. The parts imported ■were classed as manufactures of iron, and a duty of 45 per cent, ad valorem charged, under clause 216 of Heyt’s Compilation. The plaintiff claims that the goods were only dutiable, under the provisions of Schedule C of the tariff act of March 3, 1883, at the rate of one and one-quarter cents per pound, as “castings of iron not specially enumerated or provided for.”
¶5Shuman & Defrees, forplaintiff.
¶6W. H. Bliss, for defendant.
¶9The testimony in this case does not vary the construction of the acts of congress reached by the circuit court of the United States for the Northern district of Illinois in the case of Wolff v. Spalding, 26 Fed. Rep. 609. Accepting the decision of that court as the proper construction of the revenue act, and duly considering the testimony offered, the court holds that the plaintiff is entitled to recover.
¶10Judgment will be given accordingly, for the sum of $417.75, and costs.