Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

29 F. Cas. 32

Walker v. Johnson

Decided June 15, 1820

Decided 1820-06-15

¶1THE COURT

(THRUSTON, Circuit Judge,

¶2contra) was of opinion that, the assignment being void, there was no consideration for the note.

¶3See Act Md. 1793, c. 45, § 11, which authorizes an assignment of the timé of an apprentice, for the benefit of the widow, uDon the death of the master.

/29/fcas/32 · .json · Public domain