Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 29 Kan. 384 - State v. Curtis

State v. Curtis’s Empirical Analysis

1883

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
3
states following
December 2005
most recently cited

8 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently December 2005

8 state decisions

201883189019001910192019301940195019601970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Hardin v. State · Boos v. Ewing · Averill v. . Patterson · People v. Van Horne · Rutherford v. Tevis

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““There is after the perfecting of the appeal only a pending prosecution. The case stands in the district court for trial as an original prosecution there. The state may dismiss the prosecution, and then there is no judgment or case in any court.” (p. 386.)”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.