Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

29 Tenn. 52

State v. Bowling

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided September 15, 1849

Tennessee Supreme Court · decided 1849-09-15

On the 28th day of June, 1850, the grand jury empan-nelled for Roane county, returned a bill of indictment against Bowling. It charged that Bowling, on the 5th day of May, 1848, made an assault upon Enox, with intent wilfully, maliciously and with premeditation to murder him. He was tried on the plea of not guilty, and acquitted of the felony and found guilty of an assault and battery.

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently February 1888

1 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1849-09-15

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

McKinney, J.

¶1delivered the opinion of the court.

¶2In the construction- of the act of 1832, ch. 22, it has been held by this court, that in an indictment for an assault with intent to committ murder in the first degree, is included an indictment for an assault and battery; and if upon the trial the proof does not warrant a conviction for felony, the defendant may be found guilty of the *53misdemeanor. And in the latter case, if the prosecution were not commenced within twelve months “from the commission of the offence,” the defendant may avail himself of the limitation prescribed in the act of 1820, ch. 9, sec. 1, as a bar to the prosecution. But he can only do so, in a case like the present, by proof of the facts upon the trial; and not by plea, demurrer, or motion in arrest of judgment. 1 Meigs’ Dig. p. 370, and cases referred to. The judgment of the circuit court arresting judgment will therefore be reversed.

/29/tenn/52 · .json · Public domain