Diven v. Sieling

Supreme Court of the United States

Jurisdictional statement submitted September 9, 1933.

Decided October 9, 1933.

Supreme Court of the United States · decided 1933-10-09

1 counsel of record

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1933-10-09

How this case has been cited

Cited by 5 later decisions — most recently July 1965

5 state decisions

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1Mr. Géorge W. Button for appellants. Mr. Richard E. Preece for appellee.

¶2Per Curiam:

¶3The motion for leave to proceed further herein in forma pauperis is denied. The motion to dismiss is granted, and the appeal is dismissed for the-want of jurisdiction. Section 237 (a) Judicial Code, as amended by the Act of February 13, 1925 (43 Stat.. 936, 937). Treating the papers whereon the appeal was allowed as a petition for writ of certiorari as required by § 237 (c) Judicial Code, as amended (43 Stat. 936, 938), certiorari is denied.