Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

292 U.S. 609

Docket No. 991.

Dill v. Colorado

Supreme Court of the United States

Jurisdictional statement submitted May 12, 1934.

Decided May 21, 1934.

Supreme Court of the United States · decided 1934-05-21

Cited by 2 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently January 1952

1 federal appellate ·

1 counsel of record

Relies on Sproles v. Binford · Hygrade Provision Co. v. Sherman · Bandini Petroleum Co. v. Superior Court

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1934-05-21

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1Per Curiam:

¶2The appeal herein is dismissed for the want of a substantial federal question. Rosenberg v. Wisconsin, 290 U.S. 600, 601; Mueller v. Illinois, 289 U.S. 711; Leach v. California, 287 U.S. 579, 590; Lavine v. California, 286 U.S. 528; Sproles v. Binford, 286 U.S. 374, 393; Bandini v. *610Superior Court, 284 U.S. 8, 18; Hygrade Provision Co. v. Sherman, 266 U.S. 497, 501-503. Insofar as the papers whereon the appeal was allowed seek review in respect of asserted denial of rights under the Federal Constitution by rulings of the Supreme Court of Colorado not involving the validity of any statute of the state, such papers are treated as a petition for writ of certiorari (§ 237 (c), Judicial Code, as amended by the Act of February 13, 1925, 43 Stat. 936, 938), and certiorari is denied.

¶3Mr. Charles Ginsberg for appellant. Mr. Paul P. Prosser for appellee.

/292/us/609 · .json · Public domain