¶1— The transaction is at best, a very stale one; but supposing it was ever so recent, the legal reprerentative of either party is not brought before the Court. A child, as such, cannot sue for a debt due to his father; it must be his executor or administrator. And as to Mathis, he is not even stated to bo the son, or any other way connected with Eli Mathis.
¶2Judgment reversed.'