Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

3 N.J.L. 344

Jessup v. Sharp

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided February 15, 1808

Supreme Court of New Jersey · decided 1808-02-15

<p>ON CERTIORARI.</p> <p>For penalty under the swine act, the demand must state the facts as well as the appraisement, (c) If defendant attend the trial, evidence will be presumed, (d)</p> <p>This was an action brought for damages under the swine act, on the following state of demand:</p> <p>Amos Sharp, the plaintiff comes into court and demands of John Jessop, defendant, the sum of $2 28, and craves judgment for the same. To $1 28 to appraisement of John Sleeper and Jacob Hains, for damage of one of his hogs; and to $1 28 agreeable to the act of the Legislature, which makes $2 28.</p>

Decided 1808-02-15

¶1The parties appeared by consent, and the justice in his record says, after hearing the allegations of the parties, I give judgment in favor of the plaintiff for the sum of g2 28 debt, and ten cents costs.

¶2The first exception taken to the proceeding below was, that this must have been a trial without evidence, no witnesses being examined. But the court said, that in cases *250where a trial had been had in the absence of the defendant by default, and the nature of the action such as to require the examination of witnesses, they had considered it as a trial without evidence, and reversed the judgment for that cause; but had never gone so far as to reverse the judgment for this cause, when the defendant was present, as he might admit facts sufficient to maintain the action.

C. Kinsey, for plaintiff.

¶3It was then objected, that the state of demand was insufficient to maintain the action, as it merely set out [*] the appraisement and not the other requisites of the statute; and for this cause the court reversed the judgment.

/3/njl/344 · .json · Public domain