Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

3 U.S. 477

Camberling v. M'Call

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided December 1, 1798

Supreme Court of the United States · decided 1798-12

THIS caufe (fee 2 Vol. 280.) being agí . called cn the lift of arguments, the Court declared, that although they had. propofed to the Defendant’s counfel to wave the ob-jedtion to the form of bringing the action, before the expira.tion of three months from the time of proving the lofs; yet, that on his refufal to do fo, they meant to decide in favor of the objection.

Cited by 2 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently December 1798

Relies on Anonymous

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1798-12

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1THIS caufe (fee 2 Vol. 280.) being agí . called cn the lift of arguments, the Court declared, that although they had. propofed to the Defendant’s counfel to wave the ob-jedtion to the form of bringing the action, before the expira.tion of three months from the time of proving the lofs; yet, that on his refufal to do fo, they meant to decide in favor of the objection.

¶2Judgment was, accordingly, entered for the Defendant

/3/us/477 · .json · Public domain