United States v. Webb’s Empirical Analysis
30 F.3d 687 · 1994
Citation profile
46 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 111 later decisions — most recently January 2025 · most notably United States v. Bolds (2007), United States v. Kirby (2005)
46 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 3363 · 18 U.S.C. § 3551 (Mandatory Victims Restitution Act of 1996) · 18 U.S.C. § 3553 · 18 U.S.C. § 3583 · 18 U.S.C. § 3615 · 18 U.S.C. § 3651 · 18 U.S.C. § 3663 · 18 U.S.C. § 371
Relies on United States v. Stephenson · United States v. O'Neil · United States v. Truss · United States v. Williams
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 111 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“We review a district court's actions in supervised release cases for abuse of discretion.”
5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“[a]lthough the district court no longer has monthly oversight over a defendant's progress toward repayment of restitution, the government may enforce the order of restitution in any way authorized ... including seeking a judgment for criminal default....”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“if [a defendant, ordered upon conviction to pay restitution,] is ... sentenced to a term of supervised release ..., any restitution ordered under this section shall be a condition of such ... supervised release.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.