Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

30 F. Cas. 840

Young v. Bell

U.S. District Court

Decided July 15, 1806

U.S. District Court · decided 1806-07-15

Debt on a promissory note. The defendants [Bell & Wray] pleaded nil debet, and offered evidence of infancy in support of the plea. There is a difference between contracts void and voidable. This note was not void, but voidable, if infancy be pleaded, the plaintiff may reply that it was given for necessaries.

Decided 1806-07-15

THE COURT,

¶1having taken time to consider, decided (nem. con.) that infancy cannot be given in evidence, on the plea of nil debet to an action of debt on a promissory note, being of opinion that it is not void, but voidable. See Hyer v. Hyatt [Case No. 6,977], at Washington, December, 1827.

/30/fcas/840 · .json · Public domain