¶1District Court of Humacao. Foreclosure.
¶2Motion by the appellees for dismissal. On the grounds of the decisions in Boerman v. Marrero, 28 P. R. R. 76, and A. Hartman & Co. v. Cividanes, 28 P. R. R, 29, the motion was sustained. Dismissed.
30 P.R. 929
Llompart v. Díaz
Decided May 15, 1922
Supreme Court of Puerto Rico · decided 1922-05-15
Decided 1922-05-15