30 Wash. App. 460 - State v. Darden’s Empirical Analysis
1981
Citation profile
14
cited by 14 later decisions
2
states following
November 2006
most recently cited
13 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on United States v. Lovasco · 92 Wash. 2d 620 - State v. McIntyre · 94 Wash. 2d 208 - State v. Edwards · 72 Wash. 2d 904 - State v. Kramer · 13 Wash. App. 604 - State v. Setala
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The time limits set forth in subsections (b)(2) and (b)(3) shall commence to run from the date: (a) of the order binding the defendant over to the superior court following a preliminary hearing pursuant to JCrR 2.03 or (b) of the tenth day following the defendant's arrest in the event a preliminary hearing is not held or the charge is initially filed in the superior court.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage“[n]o other mode of calculation is clearly apparent from a plain reading”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“CrR 3.3 currently permits prosecutors to avoid the arrest starting point by filing in district court, since there are no requirements as to when the bindover from district court must occur. The result has been frequent use of the preliminary hearing in district court as a means of delaying the starting point for the prescribed time limits,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.