Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

300 A.D.2d 1100

People v. Thweatt

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · decided 2002-12-30

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently August 2011

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2002-12-30

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1—Appeal from *1101a judgment of Genesee County Court (Noonan, J.), entered September 7, 2001, convicting defendant upon his plea of guilty of attempted burglary in the second degree.

¶2It is hereby ordered that the judgment so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed.

¶3Memorandum: Contrary to defendant’s contention, County Court was not required to specify a period of postrelease supervision at the time of the plea or at sentencing and thus resentencing is not required (see People v Bloom, 269 AD2d 838, lv denied 94 NY2d 945). Where, as here, the court fails to specify a shorter period, the period of postrelease supervision for the determinate sentence imposed upon defendant’s conviction of attempted burglary in the second degree (Penal Law §§ 110.00, 140.25 [2]), a class D violent felony offense (§ 70.02 [1] [c]), is three years (see § 70.45 [2]; People v Skye, 298 AD2d 889; see also People v White, 296 AD2d 867). Present — Green, J.P., Pine, Hurlbutt, Burns and Gorski, JJ.

/300/ad2d/1100 · .json · Public domain