Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 301 F. Supp. 2d 527 - Cyr v. Perry

301 F. Supp. 2d 527 - Cyr v. Perry’s Empirical Analysis

2004

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
May 2006
most recently cited

1 district ·

Relationships

Applies 29 U.S.C. § 621 (§ 2 of the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967) · 29 U.S.C. § 623 (§ 4 of the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967) · 29 U.S.C. § 631 (§ 12 of the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967) · 29 U.S.C. § 633A (§ 15 of the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967) · 42 U.S.C. § 2000E (§ 701 of the Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964) · 42 U.S.C. § 2000E (§ 717 of the Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964) · 42 U.S.C. § 2000E (§ 704 of the Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964) · 42 U.S.C. § 2000E (§ 706 of the Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964)

Relies on Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. · United States v. Testan · United States v. Mitchell · Lane v. Pena Secretary of Transportation · Lehman v. Nakshian

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “No person shall be subject to retaliation for opposing any practice made unlawful by ... the Age Discrimination in Employment Act....” 29 C.F.R. § 1614.101 (b). Moreover, Scott is an employee of the Service, which has a unique relationship with the federal government. As we have explained before, Congress”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
    e.g. Scott v. Potter
  2. “[W]e hold that [29 U.S.C.] § 633a waives sovereign immunity as to claims of retaliation”), with Cyr v. Perry, 301 F.Supp.2d 527, 535 (E.D.Va.2004) (”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
    e.g. Scott v. Potter

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.