Tatneft v. Ukr.’s Empirical Analysis
2018
Citation profile
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1330 (§ 2 of the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act of 1976) · 28 U.S.C. § 1603 (§ 4 of the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act of 1976) · 28 U.S.C. § 1605 (§ 4 of the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act of 1976) · 9 U.S.C. § 201 · 9 U.S.C. § 202 · 9 U.S.C. § 203 · 9 U.S.C. § 207
Relies on First Options of Chicago, Inc. v. Kaplan · Piper Aircraft Co. v. Reyno · Arbaugh v. Y & H Corp. · Landis v. North American Co. · Verlinden B. v. v. Central Bank of Nigeria
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“may not amend its [counterclaim] through briefs in opposition to a motion to dismiss,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.