Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 301 KAN 1041 - State v. Godfrey

State v. Godfrey’s Empirical Analysis

2015

Citation profile

142
cited by 142 later decisions
1
states following
September 2024
most recently cited

142 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on State v. Williams · State v. Dukes · State v. Gomez · State v. Spotts · State v. Urista

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 142 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “necessary to serve the ends of justice or to prevent the denial of fundamental rights”
    9 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “"The arguments and authorities relied on, separated by issue if there is more than one. Each issue must begin with citation to the appropriate standard of appellate review and a pinpoint reference to the location in the record on appeal where the issue was raised and ruled on. If the issue was not raised below, there must be an explanation why the issue is properly before the court. " (Emphasis added.)”
    7 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “[L]itigants have no excuse for noncompliance with Rule 6.02(a)(5).”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.