¶1Affirmed. See: Robinson v. State, Fla. App. 1964, 161 So.2d 578; Devlin v. State, Fla.App.1965, 175 So.2d 82; Baisden v. State, Fla.App.1967, 203 So.2d 194; Shif-rin v. State, Fla.App.1968, 210 So.2d 18; Lister v. State, Fla.App. 1969, 226 So.2d 238; Staten v. State, Fla.App.1971, 248 So.2d 697; Rollins v. State, Fla.App.1972, 256 So.2d 541; Skold v. State, Fla.App. 1972, 263 So.2d 627; United States v. Cooper, 5th Cir. 1973, 472 F.2d 64; § 924.-33, Fla.Stat.
303 So. 2d 698
Frierson v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided December 3, 1974
District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1974-12-03
Relies on Baisden v. State · United States v. Cooper · 210 So. 2d 18 - Shifrin v. State
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1974-12-03
How this case has been cited
Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently June 2001
8 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
View the full empirical analysis of this case →