Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

307 Or. App. 366

State v. Addison

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided October 21, 2020

Court of Appeals of Oregon · decided 2020-10-21

Portion of judgment requiring defendant to pay $25… · Decided 2020-10-21

                                    366

 Submitted September 30; portion of judgment requiring defendant to pay $25
probation-violation fee vacated, remanded for resentencing, otherwise affirmed
                                October 21, 2020


                    STATE OF OREGON,
                     Plaintiff-Respondent,
                               v.
                MICHAEL GERARD ADDISON,
                    Defendant-Appellant.
                  Lane County Circuit Court
                    18CR63814; A170808
                                 
475 P3d 139


   Maurice K. Merten, Judge.
  Ernest G. Lannet, Chief Defender, Criminal Appellate
Section, and Kyle Krohn, Deputy Public Defender, Office of
Public Defense Services, filed the brief for appellant.
   Ellen F. Rosenblum, Attorney General, Benjamin Gutman,
Solicitor General, and Christopher A. Perdue, Assistant
Attorney General, filed the brief for respondent.
  Before Armstrong, Presiding Judge, and Tookey, Judge,
and Hadlock, Judge pro tempore.
   PER CURIAM
   Portion of judgment requiring defendant to pay $25
probation-violation fee vacated; remanded for resentencing;
otherwise affirmed.
Cite as 
307 Or App 366
 (2020)                            367

        PER CURIAM
          Defendant appeals a judgment revoking probation
on a conviction for fourth-degree assault constituting domestic violence. He argues that the trial court erred in imposing
a $25 probation-violation fee, and in imposing a 50-day jail
sentence. We reject without discussion defendant’s argument
concerning his jail sentence. Defendant argues that the trial
court erred when it imposed a $25 probation-violation fee
that was not announced in open court. The state concedes
that the court erred by imposing the $25 probation-violation
fee for the first time in the judgment. We agree and accept
the state’s concession. See State v. Pacho, 
300 Or App 398
,
450 P3d 1033
 (2019) (correcting similar error).
        Portion of judgment requiring defendant to pay $25
probation-violation fee vacated; remanded for resentencing;
otherwise affirmed.

/307/orapp/366 · .json · Public domain