State v. Atkinson’s Empirical Analysis
1983
Citation profile
10 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently March 2016
10 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on State v. Williams · State v. Small · State v. Goss · State v. Purcell · State v. Ferdinando
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[t]he issue of whether the information actually given by defendant in response to the prosecutor's question was admissible, as distinguished from the propriety of the question itself, [was] not properly before [the Court].”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“did not seek to put before the jury the specific nature of the charge; rather, he was attempting to question [the] defendant about an act of misconduct, i.e., avoiding criminal prosecution.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“The failure to move to strike the answer waives any objection to the information elicited when the inadmissibility of the testimony appears only in the response of the witness.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.