Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 31 KANAPP2D 102 - Ferguson v. State

Ferguson v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2003

Citation profile

1
cited by 1 later decisions
1
states following
November 2003
most recently cited

1 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Montana v. Hall · State v. Hall · In re Stephens · In Re Cherokee County, Kansas Health Care Facility Revenue Bonds

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Additionally, this Court states that even if an oral or written motion to dismiss or arrest judgment had been timely made or filed, it would have been overruled. Movant received a fair trial, she received the effective assistance of counsel, she was fully aware of the charges against her and was able to provide a defense, could not plead the conviction in any subsequent prosecution, or that the information violated her rights.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. ““All that would be left to apply Hall to would be the conceptually difficult instance where counsel knew of the jurisdictional problem but deliberately did not file a motion to arrest judgment for some tactical reason. It is difficult to see what valid reason there might be to do that.” 31 Kan. App. 2d at 107 .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.